Search found 10 matches

by borndevil
Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:44 am
Forum: Max
Topic: Audiophile testing - work in progress
Replies: 15
Views: 11166

oh, well. sorry, I was busy so I couldn't answer. here I copy/paste from cdr faq, but first, basically, differences between two drives or two rip programs is related on how the relationship of hardware/ripper/burning/media work. audio ripping is a subtle, unstable thing. maybe some other have differ...
by borndevil
Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:34 pm
Forum: Max
Topic: Audiophile testing - work in progress
Replies: 15
Views: 11166

well, now I'm done with so many tries.
I'm sure that in my system Toast solution sounds better than max :roll:
max ripped copy sounds too flat, with no energy, at least in my configuration. I'll keep you informed
by borndevil
Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:25 am
Forum: Max
Topic: Audiophile testing - work in progress
Replies: 15
Views: 11166

I'm not sure. Only think I can assure is that at the moment original is the best sound. Some other test revealed that paranoia ripper is not better than Toast. But this sounds strange, even if Roxio routines are optimized for audio copy. Max copy sounds a little "flat", but I really need to test a d...
by borndevil
Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:21 pm
Forum: Max
Topic: Audiophile testing - work in progress
Replies: 15
Views: 11166

Audiophile testing - work in progress

I'm an owner of Audiofile HiFi System, here's my set: CDP: Rotel RCD-02 Pre: NuForce P8 Monos: NuForce Ref 8.02 Speakers: Klipsch Ref 5 Cables: Supra PLY 3.4 + 2x AM-Audio Well, when I tried EAC in the past I was surprised how things could change with a ripping made in the right way. Records were qu...
by borndevil
Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:06 pm
Forum: Max Help
Topic: Resolved:Cue offsets incorrect
Replies: 6
Views: 6113

maybe I've done it for myself. and the answer is that only cuesheet is incorrect. I generated another cuesheet (re-ripping original CD, as mounting doesn't work - why?) and used first .wav. everything goes ok with unstable version. I'm just at the start of my testing, very interesting things are goi...
by borndevil
Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:17 am
Forum: Max Help
Topic: Resolved:Cue offsets incorrect
Replies: 6
Views: 6113

well done! please spend a little time to check my iter: I ripped with paranoia libs in MS PCM 16/44, wrote down cuesheet with one track wav only. Then I changed with text editor the .cue and wrote BIN instead WAVE and burned with toast. is this bug on ripping, or on generating cuesheet? If I edit my...
by borndevil
Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:37 pm
Forum: Max Help
Topic: Resolved:Cue offsets incorrect
Replies: 6
Views: 6113

Is this still an issue?
I tried to burn cue/wav and I have this problem as well

Maybe tracks were ripped with early version of max!
by borndevil
Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:35 am
Forum: Max Help
Topic: Clicks In Rips . . .
Replies: 4
Views: 3797

sbooth wrote:The comparison ripper does not detect errors- it just attempts to extract data as best it can from the disc..
What do you mean? Will errors read in the same way all the times?
by borndevil
Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:23 am
Forum: Max Help
Topic: Varying Track Intervals
Replies: 4
Views: 3887

at least if I use .cue + .bin right?
by borndevil
Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:18 am
Forum: Max Help
Topic: .cue flac -> CD?
Replies: 7
Views: 16966

macoloco wrote:You can also convert the flac to wav and then change the WAVE to BIN in the cue file. Then stick 'em into toast and voila!
mmm... :?
let's say we've a big .wav track and a .cue file.
what do I need to change in cuesheet?