Search found 31 matches

by disneymike
Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:54 pm
Forum: Rip
Topic: Major db difference between Rip and other programs
Replies: 23
Views: 9992

Re: Major db difference between Rip and other programs

This was with a disc I had ripped before with Rip v1.0b11. Since this disc has been seen before, the RG data has been saved. To get rid of it you'll need to either delete Rip's data (~/Application Support/Rip/Ripped CDs.sqlite) or manually set the RG to 0 for the tracks/album. Thanks. That did the ...
by disneymike
Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:42 am
Forum: Rip
Topic: Major db difference between Rip and other programs
Replies: 23
Views: 9992

Re: Major db difference between Rip and other programs

sbooth wrote:Was this with a new disc or one that you had ripped before?
This was with a disc I had ripped before with Rip v1.0b11.
by disneymike
Sat Jul 18, 2009 5:23 am
Forum: Rip
Topic: Major db difference between Rip and other programs
Replies: 23
Views: 9992

Re: Major db difference between Rip and other programs

I tried Rip v1.0b12 with the RG calculation turned off, but I still get the same result in iTunes. I tried examining my AIFF file using iVolume and it indicates there is no iTunNORM Tag associated with the file. Apparently the iTunNORM tag can be embedded in the file, but it isn't on the AIFF file r...
by disneymike
Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:16 am
Forum: Rip
Topic: Major db difference between Rip and other programs
Replies: 23
Views: 9992

Re: Major db difference between Rip and other programs

I looked at my AIFF files ripped using Rip and they indeed play at 50% volume in iTunes on my system as well. Using Peak Pro 6 they seem to play at 100%. I've ripped quite a few CDs using Rip. Since it sounds like the audio is recorded fine and the replay gain is simply an embedded number in the fil...
by disneymike
Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:52 pm
Forum: Rip
Topic: Few problems
Replies: 12
Views: 4962

Re: Few problems

With version 1.0b11, the first disc I put in resulted in no offset suggestion. With another disc, it recommended 553 for the offset. Having looked up the offset for my Sony D150A, I knew it should be 48. When I tried to enter 48 for the offset manually, if I returned to manual offset screen again, i...
by disneymike
Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:09 pm
Forum: Rip
Topic: b10 & Accurate Rip
Replies: 3
Views: 2913

Re: b10 & Accurate Rip

Stephen, I want to thank you again for your work. This version seems to be working faster and better than ever. I really do appreciate you and Rip! :)
by disneymike
Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:42 pm
Forum: Rip
Topic: Rip v1.0b9 Initial Observation
Replies: 10
Views: 4396

Re: Rip v1.0b9 Initial Observation

sbooth wrote:Copy Image will create one file containing the entire disc's audio, vs. one file per track.
That makes sense. Thank you. I had the impression it had to do with album cover artwork.
by disneymike
Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:40 pm
Forum: Max
Topic: Repeated Problems with NSTableView
Replies: 7
Views: 6251

Re: Repeated Problems with NSTableView

Workaround: After the error I close the window where I entered the track data and save it. Then I eject the cd and insert it right away again. Max recognizes the cd and shows the track data. Now ripping is possible and also on all following CD's as long as I don't close Max self. Stephen, do you fo...
by disneymike
Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:25 pm
Forum: Rip
Topic: Rip v1.0b9 Initial Observation
Replies: 10
Views: 4396

Re: Rip v1.0b9 Initial Observation

I assume you clicked "Copy Tracks" and not "Copy Image"? I retried 3 discs which were not in the AccurateRip database and all of them extracted all tracks successfully. I may have clicked "Copy Image" inadvertantly, but it's hard to imagine I did it on all 3 CDs previously! But you never know, stra...
by disneymike
Wed Jun 03, 2009 5:27 pm
Forum: Rip
Topic: Rip v1.0b9 Initial Observation
Replies: 10
Views: 4396

Re: Rip v1.0b9 Initial Observation

So you are saying that Rip reports all tracks were successfully extracted, but there are no output files? If so, please provide a bit more info: your output folder, naming settings, log file, etc. Yes, Rip reports all tracks were successfully extracted, but I only find 1 track in my output folder. ...
by disneymike
Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:26 pm
Forum: Rip
Topic: Rip v1.0b9 Initial Observation
Replies: 10
Views: 4396

Re: Rip v1.0b9 Initial Observation

You can adjust the parameters if you'd like- if a disc is in AccurateRip it is a moot point, because if a rip matches AR it will be encoded immediately. If a disc isn't in AR and it is brand new you could adjust down if you'd like- I would leave the sector matches at 3 (or 2) and change the track m...
by disneymike
Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:42 pm
Forum: Rip
Topic: Rip v1.0b9 Initial Observation
Replies: 10
Views: 4396

Re: Rip v1.0b9 Initial Observation

sbooth wrote:
  • Instead of extracting once and comparing once, the user can specify how many times a track must match to be marked as complete
So, in my case, using two brand new discs, do I need to simply adjust the parameters? It doesn't seem likely both new CDs were prone to errors, right?
by disneymike
Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:28 pm
Forum: Rip
Topic: Rip v1.0b9 Initial Observation
Replies: 10
Views: 4396

Rip v1.0b9 Initial Observation

I tried two new CDs with Rip v1.0b9 last night. Both discs did not have AccurateRip profiles and the program indicated so. So, Rip proceeded to read audio and verify each track. The first thing I noticed was each track was read and reread numerous times. In v1.0b8, when no AccurateRip data was found...
by disneymike
Sun May 31, 2009 5:37 am
Forum: Rip
Topic: Calculating AccurateRip Offsets
Replies: 2
Views: 1823

Re: Calculating AccurateRip Offsets

Are there any messages in the console to indicate what might be going on? Another trick you can do is, in Terminal, run defaults write org.sbooth.Rip logMessageLevel 2 This will enable large amounts of debuggin output on the progress of ripping, which could help pinpoint the error. Very cool. I'll ...
by disneymike
Sun May 31, 2009 5:36 am
Forum: Play
Topic: AIFF Metadata Missing
Replies: 2
Views: 4528

Re: AIFF Metadata Missing

sbooth wrote:Play doesn't support reading AIFF metadata (yet).
Ah, well that explains it. I have a hunch it may support it someday. ;)